Anxious, Avoidant, and the Dance Between Them: An EFT Look at Attachment in Relationships

Most couples don’t come to therapy because they’ve stopped loving each other. They come because they’ve gotten caught in a pattern they can’t seem to escape — the same argument, the same silence, the same ache of feeling unseen. Understanding your attachment style, and your partner’s, can help you recognize that pattern for what it is: not a character flaw, but a nervous system trying to stay safe. Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) offers a way out of the loop and back toward each other.

Attachment Is About Safety, Not Neediness

Attachment theory begins with a simple, radical idea: the need for close, dependable connection is not something we outgrow in childhood. It stays with us for life. As adults, our romantic partners become our primary attachment figures — the people our nervous systems scan for signs of safety, availability, and care. When we feel securely connected to a partner, our whole system settles. We can take risks, tolerate stress, and return to each other after conflict. When that connection feels threatened, the body responds as if to danger, because on an emotional level, it is danger.

This is the foundation of Emotionally Focused Therapy, developed by Dr. Sue Johnson. EFT reframes relationship distress not as a communication problem or a compatibility issue, but as a bond in distress — two people whose sense of secure connection has come under threat, each reaching for safety in the only way they know how. Once you see it this way, the frustrating behaviors start to make sense.

The Anxious Reach

People with a more anxious attachment style tend to be exquisitely tuned to their partner’s emotional availability. When they sense distance — a shorter text than usual, a distracted dinner, a partner who seems to be pulling away — their nervous system sounds an alarm. The fear underneath is old and deep: If I don’t hold on tightly, I’ll be left. If I don’t get a response, it means I don’t matter.

To quiet that alarm, the anxiously attached partner reaches. They protest the disconnection — sometimes through criticism, escalating requests, or a rising intensity that says notice me, come back, tell me we’re okay. From the outside, this can look like nagging, clinginess, or being “too much.” But underneath the pursuit is a genuine bid for reassurance. The protest is, paradoxically, a sign of hope. It’s a nervous system still fighting to restore the connection it believes is worth fighting for.

The Avoidant Retreat

People with a more avoidant attachment style learned, often early and often for good reason, that leaning on someone else was risky. Perhaps their emotional needs were met with dismissal, overwhelm, or unpredictability. So they adapted by becoming self-reliant, keeping their inner world close, and managing distress alone. When conflict arises or emotions run high, their system doesn’t reach — it withdraws.

The avoidant partner tends to go quiet, shut down, or physically leave the room. They may say they need space, or insist the problem isn’t that serious. From the outside, this can look like coldness, indifference, or stonewalling. But withdrawal is rarely the absence of feeling. More often it’s the presence of too much feeling, with no felt sense that expressing it will help. The fear underneath is also old and deep: If I show you what’s really going on with me, I’ll be criticized, engulfed, or found inadequate. Better to handle it myself. The retreat is a form of self-protection, not a lack of love.

The Dance: When Reaching Meets Retreating

Here is where attachment styles stop being individual traits and become a shared pattern. EFT calls this the negative cycle — the self-reinforcing loop that couples get trapped in, most classically the pursue–withdraw dance.

It goes like this. The anxious partner senses distance and reaches, often with intensity. The avoidant partner feels the intensity as pressure or criticism and retreats to protect themselves. The withdrawal confirms the anxious partner’s deepest fear — you’re leaving me — so they reach harder. The escalation confirms the avoidant partner’s deepest fear — I can’t do anything right, I’m overwhelming you — so they retreat further. Each person’s coping strategy triggers the exact thing the other most fears. Neither is the villain. The cycle itself is the enemy.

What makes this so painful is that both partners are actually longing for the same thing: to feel safe, wanted, and close. But the moves they make to get there — pursuing and distancing — push it further out of reach. Over time, the cycle can calcify into resentment, loneliness, and the quiet conclusion that we’re just not compatible. In truth, they’re usually just stuck in a loop that neither one designed.

Why Insight Alone Isn’t Enough

Many couples can name their pattern. They can say, “I pursue, you withdraw,” and still find themselves doing it thirty seconds later. That’s because attachment responses aren’t primarily cognitive — they live in the body and the nervous system, below the level of conscious choice. You can’t reason your way out of a fight-or-flight response any more than you can talk yourself out of a racing heart.

This is why EFT doesn’t stop at insight. The work is experiential and emotional. In session, a couples therapist helps each partner slow down enough to reach the softer, more vulnerable feelings hiding beneath the surface moves. Beneath the anxious partner’s criticism is often terror and grief. Beneath the avoidant partner’s silence is often shame and a fear of failing the person they love. When these deeper emotions can be named and shared — and, crucially, met with compassion rather than defensiveness — the cycle begins to lose its grip.

Toward Secure Connection

The goal of EFT isn’t to turn an anxious person into an avoidant one, or to meet in some bland middle. It’s to help both partners create enough safety that they no longer need their protective strategies as fiercely. This is what’s sometimes called “earned secure attachment” — the felt sense that I can reach for you and you’ll be there, and I can offer you my presence without losing myself.

In practice, this looks like the withdrawer learning to stay in the room and put words to their inner experience, even when every instinct says to shut down. It looks like the pursuer learning to voice the tender fear underneath the protest, rather than the sharp edge on top of it. It looks like both partners learning to recognize the cycle in real time and step out of it together — “We’re doing the thing again. Can we start over?” These small moments of turning toward each other, repeated over time, gradually rewire the nervous system’s expectation of what closeness feels like.

None of this requires that you already have secure attachment. Attachment styles are not fixed traits you’re stuck with for life. They’re patterns shaped by experience — which means they can be reshaped by new experience, including the experience of being met differently by a partner, and by a therapist who can help you both feel safe enough to try.

If You Recognize Your Relationship Here

If you read the pursue–withdraw dance and felt a flush of recognition, you’re not alone, and you’re not broken. You’re two people whose nervous systems learned to protect connection in different ways, now caught in a loop that hides how much you still long for each other. The pattern that’s keeping you apart is also, underneath, evidence of how much the bond still matters.

If you’d like support untangling the cycle and finding your way back to each other, couples therapy can help. I work with couples using an EFT-informed, attachment-focused approach, in the Hudson Valley and online across New York. Reach out to schedule a consultation and take the first step out of the dance.

Why You’re So Calm in a Crisis: An IFS Perspective on the Nervous System That Learned Emergency Early

You know who you are.

When something goes wrong — a car accident, a medical emergency, a kitchen fire, someone fainting at a party — you’re the one who moves. While others freeze, panic, or stand around saying “oh my god, oh my god,” you’ve already called 911, cleared the area, delegated tasks, and checked someone’s pulse. You’re calm. You’re focused. You might even feel, in some quiet way you’d never say out loud, more yourself than you do on an ordinary Tuesday.

People praise this. “You’re so good in a crisis.” “I’m so glad you were there.” And it’s true — you are good in a crisis. But here’s the question almost nobody asks, including you:

Why?

Calm Under Pressure Isn’t Always a Personality Trait. Sometimes It’s a Trauma Response.

For many people, exceptional crisis competence isn’t something they were born with. It’s something their nervous system learned — usually early, usually through repetition, and usually in a home where emergencies (or emergency-level emotional weather) were a regular feature of childhood.

Maybe it was a parent’s addiction, rage, or unpredictability. Maybe it was illness, financial chaos, a sibling who needed constant managing, or a household where the emotional temperature could spike without warning. Maybe nothing dramatic ever “happened” by outside standards — but the felt sense of the home was that something could go wrong at any moment, and someone had to be ready.

So you got ready. You learned to scan the room before you entered it. You learned to read micro-shifts in tone and posture. You learned to stay one step ahead of the next problem, because being ahead of it was the only thing that ever made it more bearable. And somewhere in there, your body wired calm-under-fire not as a skill you reach for, but as a default state — the place you go when the stakes get high enough.

That’s the quiet irony so many of these clients describe: ordinary life can feel harder than the emergency. The grocery store, the slow afternoon, the relationship conversation with no clear task to complete — those can leave you anxious and restless in a way a genuine crisis never does. Because the crisis is where your system finally knows exactly what to do.

What This Looks Like in the Nervous System

When a child grows up in an environment that is frightening or unpredictable, the developing nervous system adapts. In some children, repeated exposure to a caregiver who is alternately a source of comfort and a source of fear gives rise to what attachment researchers call disorganized attachment — the bind of needing to approach the very person who also activates alarm. Not every chaotic childhood produces this, and it isn’t a verdict on anyone’s parents. But where it does take hold, children often resolve the impossible bind by taking control: becoming the competent one, the caretaker, the manager of everyone else’s state.

Over years, that controlling-caregiving stance can harden into an adult identity. You become the reliable one. The calm one. The one who handles it. And because the world rewards this — at work, in friendships, in families — it rarely gets questioned. Competence is a beautifully effective disguise. Nobody sends the person holding everything together to therapy. They send them more responsibility.

An IFS Reading: Meet the Part That Runs Toward the Fire

In Internal Family Systems (IFS), we don’t treat “calm in a crisis” as simply who you are. We treat it as a part of you — a protector that took on an enormous job a long time ago and has been doing it faithfully ever since.

This part is often a manager: vigilant, organized, perpetually scanning for the next thing to handle. Its whole strategy is stay ahead of the danger so the danger can’t land on us. In an actual emergency, it’s superb — decisive, clear, unflappable. The problem is that it doesn’t clock out. It runs the grocery store and the quiet afternoon and the dinner with friends as if each one might tip into catastrophe, because that’s the only operating system it was ever given.

And underneath that manager, almost always, is an exile — a younger part who lived through the original chaos without enough protection. The frightened child who learned that nobody was coming, so they’d better figure it out themselves. The crisis-competence part exists, in large measure, to make sure that vulnerable younger part never gets overwhelmed and exposed again. As long as you’re managing the emergency, you don’t have to feel what it was like to be the emergency, with no one steady at the helm.

This is why telling someone like this to “just relax” so spectacularly misses the point. Relaxing isn’t safe to the system. Relaxing is the thing the protector has spent a lifetime preventing.

Healing Isn’t About Losing Your Superpower

Here’s what I want to be clear about, because clients worry about it: the goal of this work is not to dismantle your ability to stay calm when it counts. That capacity is real, it’s valuable, and the part that holds it deserves genuine appreciation, not eviction.

The goal is choice. Right now, for many people, the crisis-mode part is fused with them — it’s not a setting they can turn on and off, it’s the only channel. IFS work helps you build a relationship with that part: getting to know it, understanding the job it took on and the age it took it on at, thanking it for how hard it has worked, and — crucially — tending to the younger exile it’s been protecting all this time.

When that exiled part finally gets witnessed and cared for by your own core Self — the calm, curious, compassionate center IFS holds that every person has — the protector no longer has to stay on permanent high alert. It can keep its talents and finally stand down between emergencies. You stay excellent in a true crisis. You also become available to a slow afternoon. Both. That’s the integration we’re after.

A Few Questions Worth Sitting With

When was the first time you remember being “the one who handled it”? How old were you?

What does your body do in a genuinely calm, low-stakes moment — and is that comfortable or strangely unsettling?

Who took care of you when you were the one taking care of everything?

If the part of you that stays calm under fire could speak, what would it say it’s afraid would happen if it stopped?

There are no right answers. They’re just doors.

Working With This in Therapy

If any of this lands close to home, you’re not broken — you’re adapted. Your nervous system did exactly what it needed to do to get you through, and it did it well. The work now isn’t to undo that. It’s to update it: to let a system organized around survival learn that survival isn’t the only thing on the menu anymore.

I’m a licensed clinical social worker (LCSW-R) in private practice in the Stone Ridge / New Paltz area of the Hudson Valley, and I work with adults on exactly this kind of thing — trauma, attachment patterns, and the protective parts that have been working overtime for decades. I use Internal Family Systems (IFS) as a primary lens, and I offer both in-person sessions in Ulster County and telehealth across New York State.

If you’d like to explore what your “crisis self” has been carrying — and what it might feel like to set some of that down — reach out here. The part of you that handles everything is allowed to rest. We can start there.

Sources

Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. British Journal of Psychiatry, 130, 201–210. (Compulsive self-reliance and compulsive caregiving.)

Hesse, E., & Main, M. (2006). Frightened, threatening, and dissociative parental behavior in low-risk samples. Development and Psychopathology, 18(2), 309–343.

Jurkovic, G. J. (1997). Lost Childhoods: The Plight of the Parentified Child. Brunner/Mazel.

Lyons-Ruth, K., & Jacobvitz, D. (2016). Attachment disorganization from infancy to adulthood. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Main, M., & Cassidy, J. (1988). Categories of response to reunion with the parent at age 6. Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 415–426. (The disorganized-to-controlling shift.)

Main, M., & Hesse, E. (1990). Parents’ unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized attachment status. In M. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the Preschool Years (pp. 161–182). University of Chicago Press. (“Fright without solution.”)

Roisman, G. I., Padrón, E., Sroufe, L. A., & Egeland, B. (2002). Earned-secure attachment status in retrospect and prospect. Child Development, 73(4), 1204–1219.

Schwartz, R. C., & Sweezy, M. (2020). Internal Family Systems Therapy (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Related Reading

What Is IFS Therapy? A Plain-Language Guide · Healing Intergenerational TraumaYou know who you are.

When something goes wrong — a car accident, a medical emergency, a kitchen fire, someone fainting at a party — you’re the one who moves. While others freeze, panic, or stand around saying “oh my god, oh my god,” you’ve already called 911, cleared the area, delegated tasks, and checked someone’s pulse. You’re calm. You’re focused. You might even feel, in some quiet way you’d never say out loud, more yourself than you do on an ordinary Tuesday.

People praise this. “You’re so good in a crisis.” “I’m so glad you were there.” And it’s true — you are good in a crisis. But here’s the question almost nobody asks, including you:

Why?

Calm Under Pressure Isn’t Always a Personality Trait. Sometimes It’s a Trauma Response.

For many people, exceptional crisis competence isn’t something they were born with. It’s something their nervous system learned — usually early, usually through repetition, and usually in a home where emergencies (or emergency-level emotional weather) were a regular feature of childhood.

Maybe it was a parent’s addiction, rage, or unpredictability. Maybe it was illness, financial chaos, a sibling who needed constant managing, or a household where the emotional temperature could spike without warning. Maybe nothing dramatic ever “happened” by outside standards — but the felt sense of the home was that something could go wrong at any moment, and someone had to be ready.

So you got ready. You learned to scan the room before you entered it. You learned to read micro-shifts in tone and posture. You learned to stay one step ahead of the next problem, because being ahead of it was the only thing that ever made it more bearable. And somewhere in there, your body wired calm-under-fire not as a skill you reach for, but as a default state — the place you go when the stakes get high enough.

That’s the quiet irony so many of these clients describe: ordinary life can feel harder than the emergency. The grocery store, the slow afternoon, the relationship conversation with no clear task to complete — those can leave you anxious and restless in a way a genuine crisis never does. Because the crisis is where your system finally knows exactly what to do.

What This Looks Like in the Nervous System

When a child grows up in an environment that is frightening or unpredictable, the developing nervous system adapts. In some children, repeated exposure to a caregiver who is alternately a source of comfort and a source of fear gives rise to what attachment researchers call disorganized attachment — the bind of needing to approach the very person who also activates alarm. Not every chaotic childhood produces this, and it isn’t a verdict on anyone’s parents. But where it does take hold, children often resolve the impossible bind by taking control: becoming the competent one, the caretaker, the manager of everyone else’s state.

Over years, that controlling-caregiving stance can harden into an adult identity. You become the reliable one. The calm one. The one who handles it. And because the world rewards this — at work, in friendships, in families — it rarely gets questioned. Competence is a beautifully effective disguise. Nobody sends the person holding everything together to therapy. They send them more responsibility.

An IFS Reading: Meet the Part That Runs Toward the Fire

In Internal Family Systems (IFS), we don’t treat “calm in a crisis” as simply who you are. We treat it as a part of you — a protector that took on an enormous job a long time ago and has been doing it faithfully ever since.

This part is often a manager: vigilant, organized, perpetually scanning for the next thing to handle. Its whole strategy is stay ahead of the danger so the danger can’t land on us. In an actual emergency, it’s superb — decisive, clear, unflappable. The problem is that it doesn’t clock out. It runs the grocery store and the quiet afternoon and the dinner with friends as if each one might tip into catastrophe, because that’s the only operating system it was ever given.

And underneath that manager, almost always, is an exile — a younger part who lived through the original chaos without enough protection. The frightened child who learned that nobody was coming, so they’d better figure it out themselves. The crisis-competence part exists, in large measure, to make sure that vulnerable younger part never gets overwhelmed and exposed again. As long as you’re managing the emergency, you don’t have to feel what it was like to be the emergency, with no one steady at the helm.

This is why telling someone like this to “just relax” so spectacularly misses the point. Relaxing isn’t safe to the system. Relaxing is the thing the protector has spent a lifetime preventing.

Healing Isn’t About Losing Your Superpower

Here’s what I want to be clear about, because clients worry about it: the goal of this work is not to dismantle your ability to stay calm when it counts. That capacity is real, it’s valuable, and the part that holds it deserves genuine appreciation, not eviction.

The goal is choice. Right now, for many people, the crisis-mode part is fused with them — it’s not a setting they can turn on and off, it’s the only channel. IFS work helps you build a relationship with that part: getting to know it, understanding the job it took on and the age it took it on at, thanking it for how hard it has worked, and — crucially — tending to the younger exile it’s been protecting all this time.

When that exiled part finally gets witnessed and cared for by your own core Self — the calm, curious, compassionate center IFS holds that every person has — the protector no longer has to stay on permanent high alert. It can keep its talents and finally stand down between emergencies. You stay excellent in a true crisis. You also become available to a slow afternoon. Both. That’s the integration we’re after.

When One Half of You Is Celebrated and the Other Is Erased: The Mental Health Cost of Racial Idealization for Biracial Individuals

In a city as richly layered as Manhattan, where a single subway car might hold passengers from a dozen different ethnic backgrounds — Dominican and Korean, Nigerian and Irish, Puerto Rican and South Asian — questions of racial identity are woven into the fabric of everyday life. For biracial individuals, that complexity is not just cultural or social. It is deeply personal, and often, deeply psychological.

When one racial identity is consistently idealized — seen as more beautiful, more successful, more acceptable — while the other is minimized, stigmatized, or erased, the psychological cost can be profound. This dynamic plays out in families, schools, workplaces, and therapy offices across New York City every day. And for many biracial New Yorkers, the internal conflict it creates goes unnamed for years.

The Landscape of Biracial Identity in NYC

New York City is one of the most ethnically diverse places on earth. In neighborhoods like Washington Heights, Jackson Heights, Flushing, the South Bronx, and Crown Heights, multiracial families are common. Yet even here, in a city that prides itself on diversity, racial hierarchies persist. Some groups are romanticized. Others are stereotyped or dismissed. And biracial individuals who straddle these lines often find themselves caught between two worlds — celebrated for one side of their heritage while the other is quietly (or not so quietly) diminished.

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the multiracial population in New York is among the fastest-growing demographic groups in the country. Clinicians in Manhattan, Brooklyn, and the surrounding boroughs report increasing numbers of multiracial and biracial clients seeking therapy specifically around identity-related distress. This is not a fringe issue. It is a real and growing mental health concern in our city.

What Is Racial Idealization — and Why Does It Harm?

Racial idealization refers to the practice — often unconscious — of placing one racial or ethnic group on a pedestal while devaluing another. In many mixed-race families, this plays out when one parent’s race is treated as exotic, aspirational, or “better,” while the other’s is seen as a liability or source of shame. Sometimes it comes from extended family. Sometimes from peers. Sometimes from the broader culture itself — media, advertising, beauty standards, or social hierarchies.

For biracial individuals, this is not an abstract social dynamic. It lands inside the body, in the family home, in the mirror. When half of who you are is consistently treated as less-than, you cannot simply choose to ignore it. You carry both sides with you. And when one side is celebrated while the other is dismissed, the internal conflict can be destabilizing.

This dynamic is not unique to any single racial pairing. It shows up in Black-White biracial families, Latino-White families, Asian-Black families, and countless other combinations. What they share is a cultural context — whether local, familial, or societal — that assigns unequal value to different racial identities.

The Psychological Impact: What the Research and Clinicians Know

Research on biracial identity and mental health has grown substantially in recent years. Studies consistently show that biracial individuals face unique psychological stressors that monoracial individuals do not encounter in the same way. These include pressure to “choose” one identity, being exoticized or tokenized, experiencing rejection from both racial communities, and navigating spaces where their appearance does not match others’ expectations.

When idealization and devaluation are specifically in play, the impact is even more complex. Here are some of the most common psychological responses:

Fragmented Identity

When one racial identity is consistently uplifted and the other devalued, biracial individuals may unconsciously split their sense of self. They might feel “whole” only when presenting one identity and shameful or hidden when the other emerges. Over time, this can make it difficult to develop an integrated, stable sense of who they are. Clinicians call this identity fragmentation — and it is a significant risk factor for depression, anxiety, and relational difficulties.

Internalized Racism

When a child grows up hearing — directly or indirectly — that one of their racial identities is inferior, they often absorb those messages. This is internalized racism: the process by which members of a marginalized group begin to believe and act on the negative messages directed at their own race. For biracial individuals, this can be especially painful because it means rejecting a part of themselves — often a parent, a grandparent, a community.

Racial Impostor Syndrome

Many biracial individuals report feeling like they are “not enough” of either race to belong fully in either community. They may feel like frauds when claiming one identity, or dismissed when claiming both. This racial impostor syndrome is amplified when one racial community is idealized and pressures biracial individuals to pass — or to prove — their belonging in ways monoracial peers are never asked to do.

Anxiety and Hypervigilance

Constantly navigating which version of yourself is safe or acceptable in a given room takes a toll. Biracial individuals who have grown up in environments where one racial identity is devalued often develop a kind of hypervigilance — constantly monitoring social cues, adjusting their presentation, anticipating rejection. This chronic vigilance is exhausting and is closely linked to generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety, and burnout.

Depression and Grief

There is often a grief component that goes unacknowledged. The loss of a full connection to one’s heritage. The loss of being seen fully. The mourning of an identity that could have been, had the circumstances been different. For many biracial individuals, this grief sits beneath the surface for years — sometimes decades — before it is named and addressed in therapy.

The Family System and Intergenerational Messaging

Much of this idealization and devaluation begins at home. Families carry unspoken racial hierarchies passed down across generations. A grandparent who immigrated from one country may have internalized colonial messages about which skin tones are desirable. A parent who grew up in a predominantly white environment may unconsciously favor the markers of whiteness in their children. A family that has experienced racial trauma may respond by distancing from the race that was the target of that trauma.

These messages are rarely spoken aloud. They live in the praise that comes when a child “looks more” like the favored race. In the silence when the other identity is brought up. In the comments about hair, skin, features, or language. Children absorb all of it — and it shapes how they feel about their own bodies, their own worth, and their own belonging in the world.

For therapists working with biracial individuals in New York City, exploring these family-of-origin messages — and the intergenerational trauma that underlies them — is often a central part of the healing work.

What Healing Can Look Like

Healing from racial idealization and identity fragmentation is possible — and it often happens in the context of a safe, culturally competent therapeutic relationship. Here is what that process can involve:

Naming the dynamic. Many biracial individuals have never had words for what they experienced growing up. Therapy provides language — racial idealization, internalized racism, identity fragmentation — that helps clients understand their own history and symptoms in a new light.

Grieving what was lost. Healing often requires mourning the parts of one’s racial identity that were suppressed or shamed. This grief is real and it deserves space.

Reconnecting with devalued heritage. This might look like learning a language, exploring cultural traditions, building relationships within a racial community, or simply allowing oneself to say “this is mine too.”

Building an integrated identity. The goal is not to choose one side over the other, but to hold both — fully and without shame. This integration work is central to multicultural and identity-affirming therapy approaches.

Addressing trauma. When racial idealization is tied to family trauma, abuse, or neglect, deeper trauma-focused work is often needed. EMDR, somatic therapy, and attachment-based approaches can all be valuable in this process.

A Note on Colorism, Privilege, and Complexity

It is important to name that not all biracial experiences are the same. Colorism — the preference for lighter skin tones within racial and ethnic communities — plays a significant role in how biracial individuals are perceived and treated. A biracial person who appears lighter-skinned may move through the world with more racial privilege, even as they experience deep internal conflict about their identity. A biracial person who presents as darker may face anti-Black racism or other forms of discrimination while also feeling the loss of connection to lighter-skinned heritage.

Holding this complexity — privilege and pain existing simultaneously — is part of what makes the biracial experience so nuanced. Good therapy makes space for all of it, without minimizing or collapsing the contradictions.

You Don’t Have to Choose

If you are biracial and you have spent your life feeling like you had to pick a side — this is for you. You are not too much of one thing and not enough of another. You are not a contradiction. You are whole.

The messages that told you otherwise were never about truth. They were about fear, history, and unhealed pain passed from one generation to the next. In therapy, you can begin to untangle those messages from your own sense of self — and reclaim the full breadth of who you are.

New York City is full of people doing exactly this work — navigating the intersections of race, culture, family, and identity in therapy offices across Manhattan, the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens, and beyond. You are not alone in this.

Looking for a Therapist in Manhattan Who Understands Multicultural Identity?

Vanessa Lopez, LCSW-R is a trauma-informed therapist serving clients across New York, including those navigating complex questions of racial identity, multicultural family dynamics, and intergenerational trauma. If you are biracial, mixed-race, or a person of color working through identity-related pain — you deserve a therapist who truly gets it.

Schedule a free consultation today and take the first step toward healing all of who you are.

What We Inherit: Intergenerational Trauma, Birds That Trust, and the Patterns We Never Chose

There are a lot of names for the same thing.

Intergenerational trauma. Ancestral trauma. In Internal Family Systems, we call it legacy burden — the weight a part of you carries that was never yours to begin with. Different vocabularies, different lineages of thought, all circling the same truth: something gets passed down. Not just genes and heirlooms, but something harder to name. The energetic residue of how the people before us survived. Their values. Their fears. The way they understood the world and their place in it. Gender roles. Religion. Who gets to speak and who learns to stay quiet. What love is supposed to look like. What control us from our authentic self, whatever that discovery might be.

We absorb these things before we have language for them. They arrive not as lessons but as atmosphere — the unspoken rules of the house, the things that were never said but everyone knew. By the time we’re old enough to question them, they don’t feel like beliefs we hold. They feel like reality itself.

The work of healing — whether you’re doing it with a therapist, a spiritual guide, a plant medicine facilitator, or some combination — almost always begins with the same recognition: this pattern isn’t mine. It came from somewhere. The unhealed wound my grandmother carried, that my mother carried, that I’m now carrying without ever having been the one who was hurt. Naming that lineage is often the first loosening of the grip.

A park where the birds trust people

There’s a place on the eastern end of Long Island called the Elizabeth A. Morton National Wildlife Refuge. If you’ve never been, here’s what makes it strange and magical.

Word has it, that since at least the 1970s, the birds there have done something birds almost never do anywhere else in the world: they trust humans. You walk the trail with a handful of seed in your open palm, you stand still, and within a few minutes a black-capped chickadee or a tufted titmouse will drop out of the trees, land on your fingers, and eat right from your hand. It is one of the most quietly astonishing things you can experience, and it has been happening for decades.

Here’s the part that matters for our purposes. No single bird at Morton was taught to trust humans by a scientist. The trust is inherited. Each new generation of chickadees learns it by watching the older birds — by observing that the large slow creatures on the trail are safe, that the open hand means food and not danger. The behavior is transmitted down the generations without anyone deciding to transmit it. It’s just how things are done here now.

And the humans learn it the same way. As the photo on this page shows, a little chickadee landed on my shoulder. It was incredible. Nobody is born knowing you can feed a wild bird from your hand. You learn it because you saw someone else do it, or someone told you, as it happened to me when a stranger handed me a handful of seeds and said “put your hand out, and see what happens”. And as the photo shows, I started putting seeds on my shoulder. The knowledge — and the trust, and the patience the trust requires — gets passed from person to person, year after year, generation after generation of visitors.

Morton is a living demonstration of how things get passed down. In this case, it’s beautiful. Trust, transmitted across generations, on both sides of the open hand.

But every pattern has a shadow side.

The same mechanism, turned dark

If trust can be inherited without anyone deciding to teach it, so can fear. So can shame. So can the belief that you are less than, or that your body belongs to someone else, or that survival depends on staying small.

Consider the people who were brought to the United States without their consent, in chains, during the centuries of slavery. The trauma of that — the terror, the grief, the rupture of family and language and home, the daily reality of being treated as property — did not end when slavery legally ended. It was passed down. From one generation to the next, in the body and the nervous system and the unspoken rules of survival, the same way the chickadees at Morton passed down their trust. Except what was transmitted was the opposite of trust. Researchers and clinicians now have a substantial and growing literature on the intergenerational transmission of trauma in descendants of enslaved people, of Holocaust survivors, of communities subjected to genocide and displacement. The wound outlives the wounding.

This is the shadow of Morton. The mechanism is identical. Only the content differs.

Plant medicine work often brings this into sharp, sometimes unbearable focus. People sit with ayahuasca or psilocybin or kanna and find themselves face to face with patterns they had assumed were simply who they are — and realize, often for the first time, that these patterns have a history. That the rigidity, the self-denial, the fear, the particular shape of their shame, was handed to them. It belonged to someone else first. There can be enormous grief in that recognition, and enormous freedom: ‘This was never mine. I’m allowed to set it down’.

I know this one from the inside. In my first plant medicine ceremony, I watched my own brownness get edited out of the picture — and slowly understood that it had been edited out long before I ever showed up. I’m biracial, but somewhere along the line an idealization of whiteness had become the water I swam in, so quietly that I’d never questioned it. My brown skin, my Indigenous roots, the parts of me that didn’t fit the preferred image — they hadn’t just been overlooked. They’d been quietly put down, and I had absorbed the verdict without noticing. What the medicine showed me, as I sat with my own family line, was that the people who came before me had been colonized, and that idealizing whiteness had been, for them, a way to survive it. The erasure wasn’t a personal failing or even a personal choice. It was a legacy burden, passed down hand to hand, until it landed in me and started running my sense of what was beautiful and what was acceptable before I was old enough to consent to any of it. Seeing it took a long time. Setting it down is taking longer. But it started with that first clear look: oh — this was never mine.

Gender is one of the places this shows up most rigidly. For many people, the rules about what a man is and what a woman is and how each is supposed to move through the world feel less like culture and more like physics — fixed, natural, beyond question. But they’re inherited, too. They were transmitted across generations, anchored by people who are long gone, perpetuated by people who never thought to ask why. This is often seen in the religious messages that are passed down from generations to generations, making it difficult to even challenge.

Being queer can be such a disruption to the whole apparatus. I used to want to call it ironic, but that isn’t quite the right word — there’s nothing accidental about it. Living openly outside the inherited script doesn’t just bend the rules; it reveals that they were rules in the first place, choices someone made, rather than the natural order of things. Queerness interrupts the transmission. It’s one of the ways a lineage stops simply repeating itself, for instance, passing down definition of gender roles, and starts asking what it actually wants to keep.

What the research says about inheriting things we never chose

Two studies are worth knowing here, partly because both have escaped into popular culture in distorted forms, and it’s worth getting them right.

The monkeys. You may have heard the famous story of five monkeys in a cage, a banana at the top of a ladder, and a cold-water hose — where new monkeys are added one by one until none of the originals remain, yet they all still attack any monkey who approaches the ladder, “because that’s how it’s always been done.” It’s a wonderful parable. It also never happened; it’s an invented business fable.[1]

But the real study underneath it is just as instructive. In 1967, primatologist G. R. Stephenson conditioned rhesus monkeys to avoid touching an object by punishing them with a blast of air. He then paired each trained monkey with a naïve one who had never been punished. The naïve monkeys, simply by observing their trained partners — in one case being physically pulled away from the object — learned to avoid it themselves, even though nothing bad ever happened to them.[2] A fear with a real origin got transmitted to an individual who had no idea why it was there. Sound familiar?

The bell in the waiting room. You may also have seen the clip — usually from the TV show Brain Games — where a waiting room full of actors stands up every time a beep sounds. A real subject, confused, eventually starts standing too. The actors leave one by one, new people arrive, and the standing-at-the-beep keeps perpetuating itself across “generations” of strangers, none of whom know why they’re doing it.[3] It’s a great demonstration, but it’s a TV staging, not a controlled experiment.

The actual science behind it is a 1961 study by Robert Jacobs and Donald Campbell. Using an optical illusion in a dark room (where a stationary point of light appears to move), they planted confederates who reported wildly exaggerated estimates, establishing a false group “norm.” Then they replaced group members one at a time with naïve participants. The arbitrary, made-up norm persisted for several “generations” of subjects beyond the point when the last confederate had left the room — a tradition with no basis in reality, sustained purely by transmission.[4]

That’s the whole thing in a laboratory. A belief that was never true, anchored by people who are now gone, faithfully passed down to people who have no idea where it came from and keep it alive anyway.

Where therapy comes in

If you’ve read this far, you probably recognize something in this. A pattern you didn’t choose, a fear that arrived before you could name it, a way of moving through the world that you’ve always wondered about but never quite traced to its source. That’s not weakness. That’s inheritance.

The good news hidden in all of this is that transmission works in both directions. What gets passed down can also be interrupted. The patterns that were conditioned can be reconditioned. The norms that were installed without your consent can be examined, and some of them can be revised. This is, in fact, much of what therapy is for.

But you can’t revise what you can’t see. The first step is almost always just naming it: this pattern didn’t start with me. This fear has a lineage. This way of relating to my body, to authority, to closeness, to danger — it came from somewhere, and I absorbed it before I had the words to question it. Naming that doesn’t make it disappear, but it does change your relationship to it.

In the work I do, that often means spending time with parts of yourself that carry the old patterns — not to eliminate them, but to understand where they came from and what they were trying to protect. Internal Family Systems work is particularly useful here, because it treats inherited patterns not as flaws to be fixed but as adaptations that made sense in context. The context has changed. That’s the opening.

You didn’t choose most of what you inherited. But once you can see it clearly, what you do with it is finally, genuinely, yours.

[1] The “five monkeys and the ladder” story appears to originate as a business anecdote popularized by Hamel and Prahalad. Despite widespread use as a psychology reference, no such experiment is documented in the scientific literature.

[2] Stephenson, G. R. (1967). Cultural acquisition of a specific learned response among rhesus monkeys. In D. Starek, R. Schneider, & H. J. Kuhn (Eds.), Progress in Primatology (pp. 279-288). Stuttgart: Fischer.

[3] The standing-at-the-beep demonstration appears in the National Geographic series Brain Games, “Conformity” episode. It is a staged demonstration rather than a controlled experiment, but effectively illustrates behavioral transmission through conformity.

[4] Jacobs, R. C., & Campbell, D. T. (1961). The perpetuation of an arbitrary tradition through several generations of a laboratory microculture. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 649-658.

Anxiety vs. Depression: What’s Actually Happening in Your Nervous System (And How Therapy Helps)

Anxiety and depression are two of the most common reasons people seek therapy — and two of the most commonly conflated. They can look alike from the outside, and they often occur together. But in the nervous system, they are doing very different things. Understanding that difference isn’t just an academic exercise. It can change how you relate to what you’re experiencing, and it can open the door to more targeted, meaningful healing.

Two Different States in the Nervous System

To understand why anxiety and depression feel so different — and why they sometimes show up together — it helps to look at what the autonomic nervous system is actually doing in each state.

Anxiety is a state of hyperarousal. The sympathetic nervous system — the body’s “fight or flight” branch — is activated. Stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline flood the body. The heart rate increases. Breathing becomes shallow. The mind races, scanning for threats even when none are present. In anxiety, the nervous system is doing what it was designed to do — but it’s stuck in the “on” position, responding to perceived danger rather than actual danger. Common signs include restlessness, difficulty concentrating, muscle tension, irritability, and a persistent sense that something is wrong or about to go wrong.

Depression, on the other hand, is more often associated with hypoarousal — a state of shutdown or collapse. Polyvagal theory, developed by Dr. Stephen Porges, describes this as the dorsal vagal response: a nervous system that has gone offline, not with noise and urgency, but with a kind of bleak stillness. When the nervous system perceives threat as inescapable or overwhelming, it conserves resources by pulling back. Energy drops. Motivation disappears. Emotions flatten or become heavy and immovable. The world feels distant, colorless, and pointless. This is why depression so often feels like nothing — it isn’t the absence of feeling so much as the absence of the capacity to feel.

It’s also worth noting that anxiety and depression frequently co-occur, and for good reason: a nervous system that spends extended time in hyperarousal can eventually collapse into hypoarousal. What looks like a depressed crash may actually be the aftermath of years of anxious overdrive. The body runs out of fuel.

How Talk Therapy Addresses Anxiety

Because anxiety is rooted in a nervous system that is over-activated and over-predicting danger, effective therapy for anxiety works on two interrelated levels: the cognitive and the somatic.

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is one of the most well-researched treatments for anxiety. It works by helping clients identify automatic thought patterns that fuel the anxious response — catastrophizing, all-or-nothing thinking, and the mental habit of treating worst-case scenarios as inevitable. By slowing down these thought patterns and examining them with curiosity rather than fear, CBT helps the nervous system learn that it doesn’t have to respond to every perceived threat at full volume.

Exposure-based therapies take this a step further by gently and systematically confronting feared situations or sensations, allowing the nervous system to build a new association — one where the feared object is no longer paired with danger. Over time, the alarm system recalibrates. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) offers another powerful angle, teaching clients to relate differently to anxious thoughts rather than fighting or fleeing from them. The goal isn’t to eliminate anxiety entirely but to reduce its grip on behavior and identity.

Somatic and body-based approaches are particularly helpful for anxiety because the anxious response lives in the body, not just the mind. Breathing regulation, grounding techniques, and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) all help down-regulate the sympathetic nervous system. When the body learns to exhale more fully, to notice sensation without escalating it, and to return to the present moment, the nervous system begins to spend more time in the ventral vagal state — calm, connected, and regulated.

How Talk Therapy Addresses Depression

Depression requires a different therapeutic approach, in part because the nervous system isn’t overactive — it’s underactive. The goal isn’t to calm down a system that’s firing too fast; it’s to gently resource and mobilize a system that has gone quiet.

Behavioral Activation is one of the most effective evidence-based tools for depression. Rather than waiting to feel motivated before acting, it inverts the equation: small, intentional actions create the neurological conditions for motivation to return. When the depressed nervous system is gently coaxed back toward engagement with the world — through movement, social contact, meaningful activity — it begins to produce more dopamine and serotonin. Therapy can help clients identify small steps that are approachable rather than overwhelming, and process the grief and frustration that often arise when depression has narrowed one’s world.

Relational therapy and attachment-based approaches are also deeply relevant to depression, which often has its roots in early experiences of loss, disconnection, or chronic emotional unavailability from caregivers. When depression carries this relational dimension — a learned belief that one is fundamentally unlovable, burdensome, or invisible — it responds well to a therapeutic relationship that consistently offers attunement, repair, and genuine presence. The therapeutic relationship itself becomes a healing experience for the nervous system.

Psychodynamic therapy helps clients uncover the unconscious patterns and unresolved conflicts that feed depressive cycles — including tendencies toward self-criticism, emotional suppression, and the internalization of loss. Where CBT focuses on changing thoughts, psychodynamic work focuses on understanding the historical and relational roots of those thoughts, allowing for deeper and more lasting change.

Where IFS Comes In: Working With the Parts That Carry the Pain

Internal Family Systems therapy (IFS), developed by Dr. Richard Schwartz, offers one of the most nuanced and compassionate frameworks for understanding both anxiety and depression — not as disorders to be fixed, but as expressions of internal parts that developed for good reasons and are doing their best to protect you.

IFS describes the psyche as a system of parts — subpersonalities or internal voices that each carry distinct beliefs, emotions, and roles. At the heart of the model is the Self: a calm, curious, compassionate core that can lead the internal system with wisdom rather than reactivity. The goal of IFS is not to eliminate problematic parts, but to help them unburden the heavy emotions they’ve been carrying so they can relax into healthier roles.

The Angry Part Turned Inward

One of the most clinically important insights IFS offers is the concept of anger turned inward. Many people who struggle with depression carry a deeply critical internal part — one that judges, attacks, and demeans the self with a ferocity that would be recognizable as rage if it were directed outward. This inner critic is not the “real” self. It is a part that learned, often in childhood, that self-attack was a form of control: if I punish myself first, maybe I can prevent others from abandoning or humiliating me.

In IFS, rather than arguing with the critic or trying to replace it with positive affirmations, the therapist helps the client turn toward it with curiosity: What are you afraid will happen if you stop criticizing? What are you trying to protect? When this part realizes that the client — led by Self energy — is present and capable, it no longer needs to work so hard. The anger that has been turned inward can be metabolized, and in some cases, transformed into healthy assertiveness and boundary-setting.

The Part That Compares and Despairs

Another common part that shows up in both anxiety and depression is what might be called the comparing part — an internal voice that constantly measures the self against others and always finds the self lacking. This part scrolls through social media and concludes: everyone else has a better life, a better career, a more loving relationship, a more effortless existence. It looks at a colleague’s success and translates it into personal failure. It experiences someone else’s joy as evidence of one’s own inadequacy.

In IFS, the therapist would be curious about this part: when did it start comparing? What does it believe will happen if it stops? Often, beneath the comparing behavior lies a young, exiled part that carries deep feelings of not being enough — feelings that were present long before social media or professional competition. The comparing part is doing its best to keep that young part’s pain under wraps by turning it into a performance review. IFS helps clients access the exile beneath the comparer, offer it compassion and connection, and ultimately release the burden of “I am not enough” that it has been carrying for years.

The Anxious Manager and the Firefighter Parts

IFS is also uniquely well-suited to working with anxiety. In IFS language, anxious parts often function as managers — protective parts that try to prevent pain through planning, control, worry, and hypervigilance. The anxious manager believes that if it can just think through every possible scenario, prepare for every contingency, and never let its guard down, it can keep the system safe.

Meanwhile, when the anxiety becomes too overwhelming to manage, firefighter parts may activate — parts that respond to emotional flooding with impulsive, distracting, or numbing behaviors. These might look like excessive drinking, compulsive scrolling, overworking, or emotional eating. The firefighter’s job is to put out the fire fast, regardless of the long-term cost. Understanding these protective roles — rather than fighting them or shaming them — allows the therapeutic work to go much deeper.

When clients can say, “A part of me is anxious” instead of “I am anxious,” something important shifts. There is a Self that is separate from the anxiety — a Self that can be curious about it, rather than consumed by it. This slight but profound differentiation is at the heart of IFS, and it is neurologically meaningful: research suggests that naming and observing emotional states reduces their intensity and activates the prefrontal cortex, the brain’s regulatory center.

Healing Is Not One-Size-Fits-All

Whether you are navigating anxiety, depression, or both at once, what matters most is finding an approach that meets your nervous system where it is — not where it “should” be. A skilled therapist will tailor the work to what your system actually needs: sometimes more activation and gentle challenge, sometimes more slowing down and safety. Often, both.

IFS therapy, in particular, offers something that many treatment models don’t: a framework that honors the internal logic of even the most painful or disruptive emotional states. Your anxiety isn’t irrational. Your depression isn’t weakness. Your inner critic isn’t your enemy. These are parts of you doing their best with what they know. Therapy is the process of helping them learn something new — and helping you, as the Self, lead your inner world with compassion rather than fear.

If you are struggling with anxiety, depression, or the kind of internal noise that makes it hard to feel at home in your own mind, therapy can help. Reach out to schedule a consultation and begin exploring what your nervous system is trying to tell you.

Big “T” Trauma vs. Little “t” Trauma: Why the Quieter Wounds Are Often the Hardest to Heal

When most people hear the word “trauma,” a particular kind of story comes to mind: something dramatic, undeniable, and impossible to overlook. A car accident. A sexual assault. A childhood marked by violence. These are the experiences we most readily recognize as traumatic — and they are. But trauma has a quieter, more elusive sibling. One that doesn’t arrive in a single blow. One that accumulates slowly over time, in a way that makes it hard to point to, hard to name, and sometimes even harder to heal.

Clinicians often distinguish between what we call Big T trauma and little t trauma. Understanding the difference — and recognizing why little t trauma is so easy to dismiss — can be one of the most validating and liberating steps in someone’s healing journey.

What Is Big T Trauma?

Big T trauma refers to experiences that are acutely overwhelming — events that are objectively life-threatening, physically violating, or so catastrophically destabilizing that the nervous system simply cannot process them in real time. These are the experiences most closely associated with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as it is classically defined: combat exposure, sexual or physical abuse, natural disasters, serious accidents, or witnessing violence.

The defining quality of Big T trauma is that it is nameable. You can point to it on a timeline. There is a before, and there is an after. It has a shape, a story, a beginning.

Research consistently shows that these events produce measurable neurobiological changes. Studies by Bessel van der Kolk and colleagues have demonstrated that trauma is not just a psychological experience — it is a somatic one. The body stores it. Brain imaging research has shown changes in the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex following traumatic events, altering how the brain processes fear, memory, and threat detection. The landmark ACE (Adverse Childhood Experiences) Study, conducted by the CDC and Kaiser Permanente and published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine (Felitti et al., 1998), found that exposure to traumatic childhood events dramatically increased the risk of mental health conditions, chronic illness, and shortened life expectancy — outcomes that held even decades later.

What Is Little t Trauma?

Little t trauma is something altogether different — and in many ways, more insidious. It doesn’t arrive in a single devastating blow. It accumulates, quietly and persistently, over time. It is less about a discrete event and more about a pattern — the emotional climate of a home, the texture of a relationship, the messages that got repeated until they became the voice inside your head.

I often describe little t trauma as existing in what I call a gaseous state. Unlike a solid or liquid — something you can hold, point to, and examine — gas spreads out. It fills the container it’s in. You can feel it; it affects everything around you. But it has no clear shape. It’s hard to see, and harder still to name. And because we struggle to name it, we struggle to organize it. We can’t build a coherent story around it. We can’t clearly see its impact.

This is what makes little t trauma so difficult to recognize — and so easy to minimize, both in ourselves and in others. When clients sit with me and begin to trace these patterns, one of the most common things I hear is: “But nothing that bad happened to me. I had a roof over my head. My parents did their best.” And that may all be true. But the nervous system doesn’t evaluate your experience against someone else’s. It responds to what it lived through.

Examples of Little t Trauma

Little t trauma often lives in the relational patterns of early life — in the subtleties of how we were seen, soothed, and valued by the people we depended on most.

Growing up without co-regulation. One of the most foundational needs of childhood is having a caregiver who can help you manage big emotions — not just solve problems, but sit with you in distress, help you breathe, help you come back to a place of safety. This is called co-regulation, and developmental research by Allan Schore has shown it is essential to the formation of a regulated nervous system. When no one is consistently there to help a child regulate — because a parent is struggling with their own anxiety, depression, emotional unavailability, or simply doesn’t have the tools — the child learns a painful lesson early: I am on my own. That lesson gets encoded in the body long before the mind can make sense of it, and it often shows up in adulthood as hypervigilance, difficulty asking for help, or a deep-seated feeling of being alone even in relationship.

Having a highly critical parent. Not a parent who was cruel in ways that would make headlines, but one whose commentary — always finding the flaw, the mistake, the “not quite” — became the inner voice you couldn’t turn off. Over time, chronic criticism produces what researchers call a “harsh inner critic,” and it is deeply linked to anxiety, perfectionism, shame, and depression. A 2014 study published in PLOS ONE found that parental criticism in childhood was significantly associated with increased rates of depression and anxiety in adulthood, even when controlling for other variables.

Conditional love. A parent who was warm and present when you performed, achieved, or behaved according to expectation — and noticeably cooler, more distant, or disapproving when you didn’t. The message conveyed, even if never spoken aloud: I am lovable when I am useful. I have to earn belonging. This is one of the most painful and pervasive forms of attachment injury. John Bowlby’s foundational attachment theory, and subsequent research by Mary Ainsworth, established that the security of early attachment shapes our internal working models — our deepest beliefs about whether we are worthy of love and whether others can be trusted to provide it. When love feels conditional, children adapt. They become people-pleasers, high-achievers, or masters of emotional self-erasure — strategies that helped them survive, but that cost them dearly in adulthood.

Emotional neglect. A home where no one was emotionally abusive, but no one was emotionally present, either. Where your inner world — your fears, your sadness, your excitement — was consistently met with indifference, dismissal, or discomfort. Psychologist Jonice Webb, who has written extensively on childhood emotional neglect, describes it as the absence of something, rather than the presence of something harmful. That absence, she argues, can be just as shaping — and is often far harder to name.

Why the “Death by a Thousand Paper Cuts” Is So Hard to See

Big T trauma, as painful as it is, has one advantage in the healing process: it is recognizable. There is a story to tell. There are symptoms that can be traced back to it. Little t trauma, by contrast, is cumulative and relational. It doesn’t announce itself. It whispers.

Because there is no single event to point to, people often dismiss it. They minimize it. They compare themselves to people with “real” trauma and conclude that their experience doesn’t warrant attention. And yet the research tells a different story. A growing body of evidence suggests that the cumulative effect of relational, repetitive, or developmental trauma — what some researchers call “complex trauma” or “Type II trauma” (Terr, 1991) — can be just as dysregulating to the nervous system as a single acute event, and in some cases more so because it shapes the developing brain and attachment system over years, not hours.

The ACE Study mentioned earlier bears this out compellingly: it wasn’t just the single catastrophic events that predicted poor outcomes. It was the accumulation of adverse experiences — including emotional neglect and household dysfunction — that showed the strongest associations with long-term health consequences.

Naming It Matters

One of the most important things that happens in trauma-informed therapy is the process of naming what has been hard to name. When the “gas” finally takes on a form you can hold and examine, something shifts. You begin to see the patterns — not as character flaws or evidence of weakness, but as adaptations. Intelligent, creative responses to environments that were difficult to survive.

You can begin to grieve what was missing, rather than blaming yourself for the gap it left. You can understand why your nervous system does what it does. And you can, with care and time, begin to work with it rather than against it.

You Don’t Have to Have Had a “Bad Enough” Story

If any of this resonates with you, I want to say something clearly: you do not need to earn the language of trauma. Your experience doesn’t have to cross some invisible threshold to matter, to be real, or to deserve attention and care.

Little t trauma is real. It lives in the body. It shapes relationships. And it is absolutely workable — in the right therapeutic relationship, with the right approach.

If you’re curious about whether any of this might be at the root of what you’re experiencing, I’d invite you to reach out. You can learn more about my approach on my therapy services page, or contact me directly to schedule a free consultation. Healing is possible, even from the wounds that were hardest to see.

Signs You Were in a Relationship With a Covert Narcissist

Person sitting alone — signs of covert narcissism in relationships

If you're reading this after the fact — after the breakup, after the fog, after the long stretch of wondering whether you were the problem — I want to say this first: the reason it took you so long to name what was happening is not because you were naive. It's because covert narcissism is built to be hard to name. The whole structure depends on it.

The grandiose, obviously self-important narcissist is comparatively easy to spot. The covert version is quieter, more wounded-seeming, often more sympathetic on the surface. They don't dominate the room. They're the sensitive one, the misunderstood one, the one who seems to feel things deeply. And that's exactly what makes the experience of being in relationship with one so disorienting — and the recovery so layered.

Here are some of the patterns that tend to come into focus only in hindsight.

Jealousy was the main emotional channel. They could express possessiveness, jealousy, even hysterical hurt — but they couldn't sit down and say "I felt scared when you pulled away last week." Jealousy is a permitted feeling for someone organized around shame, because it casts them as the wounded party. Vulnerability without a villain is the part that's intolerable.

They wanted entanglement, not intimacy. Moving in together, buying property, starting a project, getting a dog — the push was toward structural commitment, often fast. What they couldn't do was the slower, less impressive work of being known. Logistical enmeshment can look like depth. It isn't.

Conflict became tit-for-tat instantly. When you raised something that hurt you, the conversation never stayed on the original thing. It became a ledger — well, you did this, you do that, what about the time you. You probably left those conversations more depleted than when you went in, slightly crazy-feeling, and unsure what had even happened. That wasn't an accident. For someone whose self is held together by a thin shell of okayness, "I hurt you" feels like annihilation. The deflection is the defense.

They never initiated repair. Conversations about the relationship only happened when you started them. They didn't come to you. They didn't say "I've been thinking about what you said." The emotional labor of the relationship was entirely yours — and even when you carried it, it didn't go anywhere.

Something was off about their humor, their playfulness, their interior. A lot of people describe their covert narcissist partner as flat, opaque, weirdly boring underneath the surface charm. Real humor requires a certain unguardedness — you have to be okay being the butt of the joke, noticing your own absurdity. Someone who is mostly performing a self can't quite do that. You may have felt, late in the relationship, like you couldn't actually find the person inside the person.

The ending told you everything. Maybe they ended it with no real conversation. Maybe they lied about why. Maybe they monkey branched — they found new innocent supply, that did not know them, and could not call them on their patterns: a soft landing already lined up that they wouldn't admit to. Maybe the timing was cruel — right when you were depleted or needed support, right when a generous partner would have been holding space for you. The exit is often the clearest data, because the defenses drop the performance once they no longer need you.

Belle Burden's recent memoir Strangers — which spent time at #1 on the New York Times bestseller list earlier this year — describes exactly this kind of ending: a husband of twenty years who, with no warning or explanation, abandons his wife and children, then uses a prenup she had innocently signed at the start of their marriage to threaten her financially on the way out. The book has resonated so widely in part because so many people recognize the experience of suddenly seeing that the person they loved was someone they didn't actually know. It's not a book about covert narcissism per se, but the disorientation it captures — the feeling of becoming a stranger to your own life overnight — is the same disorientation that follows so many of these endings.

If any of this is landing, I want to name something I think matters: the work of healing from a relationship like this isn't really about diagnosing them. It's about coming back to your own perception. The hardest residue these relationships leave is the doubt — the part of you that wonders if you're being unfair by seeing it clearly now.

You're not. The pattern recognition you have now is something you get to keep. It will quietly shape who you let close to you next, and it will protect a future version of you that doesn't even exist yet.

The path forward is relational. It always is. But the relationships that heal you are the ones where being known is the point — not the byproduct, not the threat. Those are real, and they're available, and you are more ready for them than you think.

If you’re navigating the aftermath of a relationship like this and are ready to work through it with support, I offer therapy for anxiety, trauma, and relationship recovery. Learn more about my therapy services page or reach out through my contact page to schedule a free consultation.

Online Therapy in New York: What to Expect and How It Works

There’s a moment a lot of people describe when they finally decide to try therapy: they’re sitting in their car, or lying in bed at 11pm, or standing in the kitchen after a hard day — and they think, I really need to talk to someone.

And then life gets in the way.

The commute. The wait time. The anxiety of walking into an office for the first time. The fact that you have 40 minutes between a meeting and school pickup, and none of it lines up.

Online therapy exists because that gap is real. And in New York — where people are juggling intense schedules, long commutes, and lives spread across a huge state — telehealth has become one of the most practical ways to actually access mental health care.

Here’s what you need to know before you start.

What Is Online Therapy, Exactly?

Online therapy (also called telehealth therapy or virtual therapy) is simply therapy that takes place over a secure video platform instead of in person. The session itself is the same — same length, same therapeutic relationship, same quality of care. You just don’t have to drive anywhere.

Sessions are typically 45 to 50 minutes, held weekly or biweekly, and conducted through a HIPAA-compliant video platform — not Zoom, not FaceTime, but a system specifically designed to protect your privacy.

Your therapist should be licensed in New York State. That part matters. A licensed therapist practicing telehealth in New York has met the same training, supervision, and ethical requirements as any in-person provider.

Telehealth works well for most people, and in New York specifically, it’s often the most realistic option. It tends to be a particularly good fit if you:

Live outside a major city, in a rural area, or somewhere mental health providers are hard to find — places like the North Country, the Southern Tier, or the Hudson Valley where in-person options may be limited or have long wait lists.

Have a demanding work schedule that makes a 60-to-90-minute appointment block (travel included) genuinely hard to carve out.

Are a parent, caregiver, or someone managing a chronic illness who needs flexibility about where and when therapy happens.

Experience anxiety, agoraphobia, or social anxiety that makes leaving the house for an appointment feel like a barrier in itself.

Want to continue working with a therapist you trust even if you move across the state, travel frequently, or split time between locations.

That said, online therapy isn’t the right fit for everyone. If you’re in active crisis, experiencing psychosis, or need a level of care that includes medication management or intensive support, in-person or higher-level care may be more appropriate. A good therapist will always tell you honestly if a different level of care is what you need.

A lot of people’s anxiety about therapy is really anxiety about not knowing what to expect. So here’s what usually happens.

Before your first session, you’ll receive a link to a secure client portal where you’ll complete intake paperwork — things like your health history, what’s bringing you to therapy, and consent forms. This is all done before you ever log on.

On the day of your session, you click a link a few minutes before your appointment time. There’s no waiting room. You appear on screen, your therapist appears, and you talk. The first session is usually about getting to know each other — what’s been difficult, what you’re hoping for, a little bit of your history. You don’t have to have it all figured out before you show up.

One thing that surprises people: it doesn’t feel as strange as they expect. Most people find the format becomes comfortable quickly, and many say they actually feel more relaxed being in their own space.

This is one of the most common questions, and it’s a good one.

Legitimate telehealth platforms used by licensed therapists are HIPAA-compliant, meaning your sessions are encrypted and your information is protected the same way your medical records are. Your therapist is also bound by the same confidentiality rules in telehealth as in person.

Your own environment is something to think about, though. You’ll want a private space — a room with a door, headphones if you live with others, maybe a white noise machine outside the door. A parked car works surprisingly well. So does a bedroom with the sound on low. The goal is just that you can speak freely without worrying about being overheard.

In most cases, yes. New York State has strong telehealth parity laws, which means insurance plans are generally required to cover telehealth services at the same rate as in-person care. This includes many commercial insurance plans, and in some cases Medicaid.

That said, coverage varies by plan, so it’s worth verifying with your insurance directly — or asking your therapist’s office to help you check.

If you’re paying out of pocket, many therapists (including those who don’t accept insurance directly) can provide a superbill — a detailed receipt you can submit to your insurance for potential reimbursement.

If you’re thinking about trying online therapy in New York, the process is simpler than most people expect.

You look for a licensed therapist in New York State who offers telehealth — a search on Psychology Today, Zocdoc, or a therapist’s own website will usually tell you. You reach out, ask about availability and cost, and schedule a consultation. Many therapists offer a free 15-minute phone or video call so you can get a sense of whether it’s the right fit before committing.

The hardest part isn’t the technology. It’s usually just deciding to start.

If you’ve been putting off therapy because the logistics felt like too much — the commute, the scheduling, the uncertainty — online therapy exists specifically to remove those barriers. You can do this from your living room, your lunch break, or your parked car in a quiet lot.

The work is the same. The support is real. And you don’t have to leave home to get it.

Vanessa Lopez, LCSW-R is a licensed therapist based in the Hudson Valley offering online therapy to adults across New York State. She specializes in anxiety, depression, trauma, and major life transitions. To schedule a free consultation, visit the Contact page.

Betrayal and Infidelity: An EFT Perspective on the Crossroads of Staying or Leaving

When infidelity happens in a relationship, it doesn’t just shatter trust — it shatters the story you thought you were living. The person who was lied to often describes a before and an after, a split in their life’s timeline that can feel impossible to bridge. They may lie awake asking: How did I not know? Was any of it real? Can I ever trust again? And perhaps most painfully: Should I stay — or should I go?

What Is Betrayal Trauma — and Why Does It Feel Like This?

Betrayal trauma is a specific kind of psychological wound that occurs when someone we deeply depend on — a partner, a spouse — violates the trust that was the foundation of the relationship. Unlike other forms of loss, betrayal trauma is layered: there is grief for the relationship you thought you had, rage at having been deceived, and a destabilizing confusion about your own perceptions. Many people describe symptoms that closely resemble PTSD — intrusive thoughts, hypervigilance, difficulty sleeping, anxiety, and depression.

In Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT), infidelity is understood as an attachment injury — a rupture in the emotional bond that tells us we are safe with this person. When that bond is broken by deception, the injured partner is left in a kind of relational free-fall. The felt sense of security is gone. And the nervous system, wired to detect threat, often stays on high alert long after the initial discovery.

The Crossroads: Should I Stay or Should I Go?

There is no formula for this decision. No checklist that tells you whether staying or leaving is the right choice. What EFT-informed therapy recognizes is that the decision to stay in or leave a relationship after infidelity is deeply personal, profoundly subjective, and cannot be made by anyone but you.

Staying does not mean you are weak. Leaving does not mean you are giving up. Both paths carry weight, both require courage, and both deserve respect — including your own self-respect.

When children are part of the equation, the complexity deepens. Parents often feel a competing pull between protecting their own emotional safety and maintaining family continuity for the sake of their children. These are legitimate concerns. But staying together for the children alone — without doing genuine relational repair work — can create a household that carries its own quiet damage. Children are attuned to the emotional climate of a home. What helps them most is not just keeping two parents under one roof, but ensuring those parents are emotionally present, regulated, and — if possible — working toward something real.

The Role of Accountability: Why It May Be the Most Important Variable

If there is one factor that shapes the trajectory of a relationship after infidelity more than any other, it is this: the willingness of the partner who caused harm to take genuine, sustained accountability for what they did.

Accountability is not the same as an apology. An apology can be offered in a moment. Accountability is a process — it involves acknowledging the full impact of the betrayal, sitting with the discomfort of having caused deep harm, and demonstrating through changed behavior (not just words) that the relationship is being taken seriously.

In EFT, when working through an attachment injury like infidelity, the offending partner is asked to do something that is genuinely hard: to tolerate being with the injured partner's pain without becoming defensive, minimizing, or making the conversation about themselves. This kind of accountability — which says "I see what I did, I understand why it hurt you so deeply, and I am not going anywhere from that truth" — is the emotional soil in which trust can begin to regrow.

When accountability is absent, or when it is performed rather than felt — when the partner who cheated becomes irritable at continued questions, minimizes the betrayal, shifts blame, or shows that they are more concerned with being forgiven than with truly understanding the damage — the injured partner often finds themselves in a painful and impossible position: expected to heal while the conditions that caused the wound remain unchanged.

This is an important clinical truth: you cannot do couples therapy on a partner who is not willing to show up for it honestly. The therapeutic container requires both people to be present, uncomfortable, and committed to something larger than their own defensiveness.

What EFT Offers Couples Navigating This

Emotionally Focused Couples Therapy (EFT) was developed by Dr. Sue Johnson and is one of the most evidence-based approaches for couples in crisis. It works from the understanding that adult romantic relationships are attachment relationships — meaning we are wired to need a primary partner who functions as a safe haven and a secure base.

After infidelity, EFT helps couples do several things: understand the underlying attachment dynamics that may have contributed to the disconnection in the relationship; process the attachment injury itself — including the full emotional impact on the injured partner; rebuild secure communication and emotional responsiveness; and make a clear-eyed, non-coerced decision about the future of the relationship.

EFT does not assume every couple should stay together. What it offers is a space in which both partners can be honest, feel heard, and make an informed decision about what comes next — whether that is genuine reconciliation or a compassionate uncoupling.

There Is No Right Answer — and You Are Not Weak for Staying

One of the most damaging myths about infidelity is that a person with self-respect would leave. This framing ignores the complexity of long-term relationships, shared history, children, financial entanglement, deep love that may still be present, and a person's own values about commitment.

Staying can be a deeply considered, courageous choice — one made not from fear or powerlessness, but from a genuine desire to work toward something that can become whole again. Equally, leaving can be a deeply considered, courageous choice — one made not from anger or impulsiveness, but from an honest reckoning with what has been broken and what cannot be rebuilt.

What matters most is that the decision is yours, that it is made with support, and that it is made from a grounded place — not from the acute fog of fresh trauma.

The Role of a Skilled Therapist in Navigating These Waters

The period immediately following the discovery of infidelity is not a time to make permanent decisions. It is a time to stabilize, to get support, and to begin processing something that can feel impossible to hold alone.

A skilled therapist — particularly one trained in EFT, couples therapy, or trauma-informed relational work — can offer what friends, family, and the internet cannot: a non-judgmental space in which all of your feelings are allowed, your values are centered, and your choices are yours. A good therapist will not push you toward staying or leaving. They will help you get clear on what you actually feel, what you actually need, and what a livable future might look like — whatever form it takes.

Individual therapy is often a vital companion to couples therapy after infidelity. The injured partner especially may need a space that is theirs alone — where they can process the grief, the rage, the confusion, and the complex feelings of still loving someone who hurt them so deeply.

You Do Not Have to Navigate This Alone

Betrayal is one of the most destabilizing experiences a person can go through. The anxiety, depression, and grief that follow infidelity are real, are valid, and deserve to be treated with the same seriousness as any other significant psychological wound.

Whether you are deciding whether to stay, whether to leave, or whether you are simply in the middle of not knowing — there is support available. You do not have to figure this out alone, and you do not have to pretend you are okay when you are not.

If you are navigating infidelity, betrayal trauma, or relationship uncertainty, I offer both individual therapy and couples therapy grounded in EFT and trauma-informed care. Reach out to schedule a consultation — for yourself, your relationship, or both.

Coming Out at Any Age: The Ongoing Courage It Takes to Be Seen in a World That Isn’t Always Safe

There is no single moment of coming out. For most queer people, it is not one door they walk through once and then close behind them. It is a lifetime of small and large decisions — at the doctor’s office, at a family dinner, at a new job, in a first therapy session — about whether to be seen, how much to reveal, and whether the room they are standing in is safe enough to hold who they really are.

As a therapist, I sit with this reality regularly. I work with people in their twenties, their forties, their sixties, who are still navigating what it means to live as their authentic selves — people who may have known who they were for decades but never felt safe enough, supported enough, or free enough to say it out loud. Coming out is not a rite of passage confined to adolescence. It is a living, breathing, ongoing act of self-determination. And right now, in our current political climate, that act has become harder, more fraught, and for many people, genuinely dangerous.

Coming Out Is Not a One-Time Event

The popular narrative around coming out tends to center on the teenager who finally tells their parents, the tearful revelation, the relief or the rejection that follows. But this framing misses so much of the truth. Many queer people come out in stages, to some people but not others, in some contexts but not all. A gay man might be fully out at work but still closeted with extended family. A trans woman might be visible in her personal life but navigate daily misgendering at her job. A bisexual person may feel invisible in both straight and queer spaces, questioned about the validity of their identity from multiple directions at once.

This layered reality means the work of coming out — the emotional labor, the risk assessment, the grief and relief and uncertainty — never fully ends. Each new relationship, each new setting, each life transition brings another decision point. And when the world outside is actively hostile, those decisions carry far more weight.

When Government Becomes the Threat

There has always been a gap between how society says it treats queer people and how queer people actually experience being in the world. But something shifts psychologically when the government itself begins to signal — through legislation, executive action, or the rhetoric of elected leaders — that LGBTQ+ identities are undesirable, dangerous, or simply invalid. That shift is not abstract. It is felt in the body.

When laws are passed restricting gender-affirming care, when trans people are publicly told their identities are not real, when officials use homophobic and transphobic language from positions of power, the message received by queer people is not just political. It is personal. It says: you are not safe here. It says: the institutions meant to protect you will not. It says: we see you, and we are against you.

For someone who is just beginning to understand their identity, or who has been gathering courage to come out for years, this kind of messaging can be devastating. It confirms the worst fears that have kept them silent. It teaches the nervous system that openness is dangerous — and the nervous system, once taught that lesson, is not easily untaught.

The Psychological Weight of Invisibility and Hypervigilance

One of the most underappreciated costs of living in the closet — or of living in a world that makes openness feel unsafe — is the chronic drain on mental and emotional resources. Queer people who are not fully out often spend enormous energy managing information: who knows, who doesn’t, what pronoun to use about a partner in conversation, how to deflect, how to redirect, how to disappear.

This is not a small thing. Research in psychology has long documented the concept of minority stress — the additional psychological burden that comes from belonging to a stigmatized group. For queer people navigating hostile environments, minority stress is not an occasional spike. It is a baseline. It reshapes the nervous system over time, contributing to elevated rates of anxiety, depression, and trauma-related symptoms. The closet is not neutral. Concealment has a cost.

And yet, for many people, coming out does not feel like a choice — it feels like a risk that may not be survivable. For a teenager in a religious household, for an immigrant whose community holds deeply conservative views, for an older adult who built their entire life around a heterosexual identity, for a person in a state where their rights are being actively stripped — the calculus of coming out is genuinely complex. Dismissing these barriers, or suggesting that visibility is always the answer, misses the very real danger that some people face.

Book a session

How Childhood Trauma Shapes the Adult Nervous System: Fight, Flight, Fawn, and Dissociation

Here's the revised version, tweaked to speak directly to adults carrying these patterns — while keeping all the depth and clinical richness of the original:

How Childhood Trauma Shapes the Adult Nervous System: Fight, Flight, Fawn, and Dissociation

The nervous system is a remarkable and ancient survival system. Long before we develop language, reasoning, or the ability to make sense of our experiences, the body already knows how to protect us. When danger is detected — whether real or perceived — the brain and nervous system mobilize a response, often in a fraction of a second, without any conscious decision-making.

For many adults sitting in a therapy office, the patterns they're struggling with — explosive anger, chronic anxiety, people-pleasing, emotional numbness, difficulty being present — didn't begin in adulthood. They began in childhood, in a body that had no other choice.

The Survival Blueprint: A Nervous System Under Threat

To understand how childhood trauma shapes us as adults, it helps to first understand what the nervous system is trying to do. At its core, its job is one thing: keep you alive. It constantly scans the environment for signs of safety or danger — a process the neuroscientist Stephen Porges calls neuroception — and responds accordingly, mostly without our awareness.

When threat is detected, the body mobilizes one of four primary defense responses. These are not choices. They are biological imperatives, inherited from millions of years of evolution, designed to protect organisms from predators, injury, and death. For children living inside traumatic environments they cannot escape, these responses become more than momentary reactions — they become the architecture of who they grow up to be.

The Four Defenses

Fight

The fight response is perhaps the most familiar. When the nervous system perceives a threat and determines it can be overpowered, it floods the body with adrenaline and cortisol. The heart rate accelerates, muscles tense, the jaw clenches, and the body prepares for confrontation. In a child, this can look like explosive anger, defiance, or aggression — behaviors often labeled as "problems" rather than what they actually are: a survival system doing exactly what it was designed to do.

For children in chaotic or abusive homes, the fight response may activate chronically, keeping the nervous system in a near-constant state of arousal. In adulthood, this same wiring can show up as quick temper, difficulty tolerating conflict, or feeling perpetually braced for attack — even in relationships that are genuinely safe.

Flight

When fighting isn't viable, the next instinct is to run. The flight response mobilizes the same surge of stress hormones but directs energy outward — toward escape. In children, flight doesn't always look like literally running away. It can manifest as avoidance, withdrawal, constant busyness, or mentally "checking out" during difficult moments.

For a child who cannot physically leave a threatening environment, that flight energy has nowhere to go. It becomes trapped in the body. In adulthood, it often resurfaces as chronic anxiety, restlessness, an inability to slow down, or a persistent sense that something terrible is always just around the corner — even when life is objectively okay.

Fawning

Less widely known than fight or flight, the fawn response was brought into broader clinical awareness largely through the work of therapist Pete Walker. Fawning is the survival strategy of appeasement — making oneself agreeable, invisible, or indispensable to the person who represents the threat, in hopes of avoiding harm.

For children, this is often the most adaptive response available. A child cannot fight a parent. A child cannot flee a home. But a child can learn to read the room with extraordinary precision, suppressing their own needs and becoming perfectly compliant in order to stay safe. Over time, fawning rewires a person's sense of self around the emotional needs of others.

In adulthood, this pattern is often at the root of chronic people-pleasing, difficulty saying no, codependent relationships, and a deep uncertainty about one's own desires, feelings, and identity. Many adults who fawned as children describe not knowing who they really are — because for so long, who they were depended entirely on who someone else needed them to be.

Dissociation

When fight, flight, and fawning all fail — or when the threat is so overwhelming that no active response feels possible — the nervous system can move into its most radical form of protection: disconnection. Dissociation is the body's way of leaving when it cannot leave. It is the shutdown response, governed by the oldest part of the autonomic nervous system, the dorsal vagal complex.

Children experiencing abuse, neglect, or chronic instability may learn to "go somewhere else" in their mind — feeling numb or foggy, staring blankly, losing track of time, or watching themselves as if from outside their body. This is not imagination or defiance. It is mercy — the nervous system dimming the lights when reality becomes unendurable.

In adulthood, chronic dissociation can look like emotional numbness, difficulty staying present in conversations or relationships, fragmented memory, or a persistent sense of feeling "unreal." The body that learned to leave in order to survive can struggle, years later, to come home.

Why Childhood Is Different — And Why It Follows Us

Adults living through threat generally retain some degree of agency. They can leave a relationship, call for help, make choices. Children, by the nature of their dependency, have none of these options. A child cannot fire the parent who frightens them. A child cannot choose a safer home.

This absence of agency is critical. The nervous system's survival responses are designed for short-term activation — a threat appears, the body responds, the danger passes, and the system returns to rest. But when the threat is the home itself, when the source of danger is also the source of love and survival, there is no resolution. The defenses do not get to complete their cycle. They become the baseline.

This is what trauma researchers mean when they speak of the nervous system being "stuck." The child who lived in fight mode grows into an adult whose body still braces for attack, even in safe relationships. The child who learned to fawn still struggles to identify their own needs decades later. The child who dissociated still finds themselves "checked out" during difficult conversations — not because they are choosing to be distant, but because the body remembers.

These are not character flaws. They are not signs that something is fundamentally broken. They are the nervous system's loyal, creative, and often heroic attempts to keep a small person alive in an environment they had no power to change.

You Are Not Your Survival Responses

One of the most powerful shifts that can happen in therapy is recognizing these patterns for what they are: adaptations, not identities. The anger, the anxiety, the people-pleasing, the numbness — these made sense once. They may have even kept you safe.

But you are not a child anymore. And healing, at its core, is the process of slowly expanding the nervous system's sense of safety so that these responses no longer need to run continuously. Through trauma-informed therapy, somatic approaches, consistent relational safety, and the experience of being truly seen, the nervous system can begin to learn what you never got to know as a child: that it is safe to stop running, safe to stop fighting, safe to be a person with needs, and safe to stay.

The body kept score. Now, gently, we help it learn a new story.

If you recognize yourself in any of these patterns and are curious about what healing might look like, I invite you to reach out. Together, we can begin to make sense of what your nervous system has been carrying — and find a way forward.

Menopause and Mental Health: Why So Many Women Are Getting the Wrong Answers

For many women, midlife brings something unexpected: depression, anxiety, mood swings, and emotional changes that feel unfamiliar and hard to explain.

You may find yourself asking:

• Why am I suddenly anxious all the time?

• Why do I feel depressed when nothing obvious has changed?

• Why can’t I handle stress the way I used to?

These are common questions during perimenopause and menopause, yet many women are given incomplete answers.

When Depression and Anxiety Are Misunderstood

Depression and anxiety are real and valid mental health conditions. But during midlife, they are often diagnosed without considering hormonal changes.

During perimenopause, estrogen and progesterone fluctuate in unpredictable ways. These hormones directly affect brain chemistry, including:

• Serotonin (linked to depression)

• Dopamine (motivation and pleasure)

• GABA (calming the nervous system and anxiety regulation)

As these systems shift, symptoms can look exactly like:

• Clinical depression

• Generalized anxiety

• Panic attacks

• Irritability or emotional sensitivity

• Brain fog and difficulty concentrating

• Insomnia or disrupted sleep

This overlap is where things get confusing. Many women are accurately describing depression and anxiety symptoms, but the underlying cause may be partly hormonal.

Why So Many Women Get the Wrong Diagnosis

Symptoms Overlap

The symptoms of menopause, depression, and anxiety are so similar that one can easily be mistaken for the other.

Lack of Information

For years, menopause was rarely discussed—especially its connection to mental health. Many women were never told that anxiety and depression can increase during perimenopause.

Gaps in Training

Not all healthcare providers are trained to recognize how hormonal changes affect mental health, leading to treatment that focuses only on symptoms.

One-Dimensional Treatment

Antidepressants or anti-anxiety medications may be prescribed quickly. While helpful for some, they may not fully address symptoms if hormonal fluctuations are part of the picture.

The Emotional Impact of Not Having the Full Picture

When depression and anxiety are treated without context, it can feel deeply personal:

• “Something is wrong with me.”

• “I don’t recognize myself anymore.”

• “Why am I suddenly struggling?”

Without understanding the role of menopause, many women carry unnecessary self-blame.

What Research Is Now Showing

There is increasing research on the link between menopause, depression, and anxiety, and the findings are clear:

• Perimenopause is a time of increased vulnerability to mood changes

• Hormonal fluctuations can directly impact emotional regulation

• Sleep disruption plays a major role in worsening anxiety and depression

• Addressing both mental health and hormonal factors leads to better outcomes

What was once overlooked is now being recognized.

How a Mental Health Provider Can Help

Speaking with a mental health provider who understands menopause, depression, and anxiety can help you make sense of what’s happening.

Therapy can support you in:

• Understanding whether symptoms are hormonally influenced

• Learning tools to manage anxiety, mood swings, and stress

• Processing the identity shifts that often come with midlife

• Coordinating care with medical providers if hormone-related treatment is needed

Most importantly, therapy provides a space where your experience is validated, understood, and put into context.

A Transition That Was Never Fully Spoken About

Many women move through perimenopause without a clear roadmap. This stage of life—especially the mental health impact of menopause—was not openly discussed in previous generations.

Now, that is changing.

More women are speaking openly about:

• sudden onset anxiety

• unexpected depression

• emotional intensity during midlife

• the connection between hormones and mental health

With that shift comes better awareness—and better care.

The Bottom Line

If you are experiencing depression, anxiety, mood swings, or emotional changes in midlife, it’s worth asking:

Could this be menopause, not just mental health?

In many cases, the answer is both.

Understanding that can help you move from confusion to clarity—and toward the kind of support that actually fits what you’re going through.

How to Find the Right Therapist: Why the Hardest Part Is Starting

Nobody really prepares you for this part.

You finally decide you’re going to do it. You’re going to get help. Maybe it took you months, maybe years, to get to this point — to admit that you could use someone in your corner who isn’t a friend, a parent, or the internet. You open your laptop, ready to take the brave next step, and you’re immediately flattened by what’s waiting for you.

Directories with thousands of names. Little square headshots. Smiling strangers listing acronyms you’ve never heard of — CBT, DBT, EMDR, IFS, ACT, psychodynamic, somatic, attachment-based, trauma-informed. Some take your insurance. Most don’t. The ones who do aren’t accepting new clients. The ones who are have a four-month waitlist. The ones with openings charge $250 a session out of pocket. You close the laptop. You tell yourself you’ll try again next week.

If this sounds familiar, you are not alone, and you are not doing it wrong. Finding a therapist is genuinely, structurally hard — and that’s before you’ve even met one. For many people, the search itself becomes the biggest barrier to mental health care. Not the therapy. The starting point.

Why the search feels so hard

A few things tend to stall people in the search phase:

There are too many options, and no obvious way to compare them. Insurance terms — in-network, out-of-network, deductible, superbill, reimbursement — feel like a second language. Reaching out at all means admitting you need support, which can bring up its own anxiety and shame. And underneath it all is the fear of getting it wrong: What if I pick the wrong person? What if I sit through ten sessions and nothing changes?

That fear is reasonable. It’s also the thing most worth addressing directly, because it points to something the directories don’t tell you.

The relationship matters more than the method

Once you get past the logistics, you run into the next wall: figuring out what kind of therapist you need. The internet will tell you, with great confidence, that you need a very specific modality. If you have anxiety, you need CBT. If you have trauma, you need EMDR. If you have patterns you can’t shake, you need psychodynamic work. If you have big feelings, you need DBT.

There’s real research behind these recommendations, and I don’t want to dismiss it. Different approaches genuinely do have different strengths, and for some specific issues — particular phobias, acute PTSD, OCD — there’s evidence that certain modalities perform better. If you’re dealing with something specific like that, factor it in.

But here’s the thing that took me a long time to understand, and that I wish someone had told me earlier:

Decades of psychotherapy research keep arriving at the same inconvenient finding. The single biggest predictor of whether therapy works isn’t the theoretical orientation of the therapist. It’s the quality of the relationship between the two of you. Researchers call it the therapeutic alliance — how safe you feel, how understood you feel, whether you believe this person actually gets you and is on your side.

You can be with the most credentialed, best-trained, most modality-pure therapist in your city, and if you don’t feel a connection with them, the work will grind. You’ll censor yourself. You’ll perform “being a good client.” You’ll leave sessions feeling like you said the right things but nothing really moved. You’ll wonder why everyone else seems to be getting so much out of this.

Or you can be with someone whose approach you couldn’t precisely name, and feel — in the first ten minutes — like something has loosened in your chest. Like you can tell them the thing you’ve never told anyone. Like they heard the part underneath what you said, not just the words.

That second experience is what you’re actually looking for.

What a connection actually feels like

It’s not chemistry in the romantic sense. It’s not that you love them or that they’re your favorite person. It’s quieter than that. It’s a feeling of I can bring my real self into this room. A feeling that you’re not being subtly judged, rushed, or redirected away from the things that actually scare you. A feeling that they’re tracking you — not just the content of your sentences, but the places you slow down, the topics you skate past, the jokes you make when you’re uncomfortable.

Sometimes it shows up as relief. Sometimes as tears you didn’t expect. Sometimes it’s just that you find yourself thinking about what you talked about for days afterward, not because it was dramatic, but because something landed.

Conversely, you’ll know when it’s not there. You’ll feel performative. You’ll feel like you’re explaining yourself too much. You’ll leave feeling tired in the wrong way — drained rather than worked.

A more effective way to search

Instead of trying to “get it right” on the first try, approach the process differently.

Schedule multiple consultations. Most therapists offer a free 15-minute consultation. Use them. Talk to two, three, even four people if you can. You’re not being indecisive — you’re gathering data your gut needs to make a real decision.

Pay attention to how you feel, not just what they say. During and after the call, ask yourself: Do I feel at ease talking to this person? Do I feel heard? Is there a natural flow, or am I working hard to fill the space? You are not interviewing for the best résumé. You are looking for the best fit.

Ask the practical questions out loud. Do you take my insurance, or do you offer superbills for out-of-network reimbursement? What are your fees? What’s your general approach? Do you see clients in person, online, or both? A good therapist will answer these clearly and won’t make you feel awkward for asking.

Give yourself permission to choose based on connection. This is where most people get stuck. They override their gut and pick based on convenience or cost. Those matter — but the relationship is what drives outcomes. If you can find a way to weigh both, do.

A quick word on insurance and cost

Searching “affordable therapy near me” or “does therapy take my insurance” usually leads to more confusion, not less. The basic landscape:

In-network therapists cost less upfront but tend to have fewer openings and less flexibility. Out-of-network therapists ask you to pay upfront, but if your plan includes out-of-network mental health benefits, you can submit a superbill and get reimbursed for a portion of each session. Many people find that the out-of-network route, while more work administratively, opens up a much wider pool of therapists they might actually click with.

If any of this is opaque, ask the therapist directly. A good one will walk you through your options without making you feel small for not knowing.

Permission to shop

One more thing most people don’t know: it is completely, 100% okay to not click with a therapist and to try someone else. In fact, it’s expected. Good therapists know this. A good therapist, when it’s not working, will often be the first one to tell you so and help you find someone else.

The first session is not a commitment. Neither is the second or the third. Trust your body’s response. If you dread sessions in a way that feels like resistance to the work — that’s one thing, and worth talking about. If you dread sessions because you genuinely don’t feel safe or understood in the room — that’s information, and you’re allowed to act on it.

Starting is the turning point

The hardest step is often sending that first email or making that first call. After that, things tend to move.

You don’t have to have everything figured out before starting therapy. You don’t need the “perfect reason.” You don’t even need to know exactly what you want to work on. You just need to begin.

The modality matters. Of course it does. But it matters less than whether you trust this person enough to show them what’s actually going on. Finding that person is hard. It may take more than one try. It may take more than five. But when you find them, you’ll know — not because they have the right letters after their name, but because, for maybe the first time in a long time, you’ll feel like someone is really listening.

And that, more than any technique, is where the healing starts.

If you’re looking for therapy in New York or the Hudson Valley, I offer a free 15-minute consultation to help you get a sense of whether we’re a good fit. No pressure, no script — just a conversation.

You can learn more or schedule a consultation at www.vanessalopeztherapy.com.